Chlorine 37 Protons Neutrons Electrons

Subatomic particle with positive charge

Proton

The quark content of a proton. The colour assignment of individual quarks is arbitrary, but all three colors must be nowadays. Forces betwixt quarks are mediated past gluons.
Classification	Baryon
Composition	ii up quarks (u), 1 downwardly quark (d)
Statistics	Fermionic
Family	Hadron
Interactions	Gravity, electromagnetic, weak, strong
Symbol	p , p + , N + , ane one H +
Antiparticle	Antiproton
Theorized	William Prout (1815)
Discovered	Observed as H+ past Eugen Goldstein (1886). Identified in other nuclei (and named) by Ernest Rutherford (1917–1920).
Mass	ane.672621 923 69(51)×10−27 kg [1] 1.007276 466 621(53) Da [ii] 938.272088 16(29)MeV/c 2 [3]
Hateful lifetime	> 3.6×1029 years [iv] (stable)
Electric accuse	+1e ane.602176 634 ×ten−19 C [five]
Charge radius	0.8414(nineteen) fm [5]
Electrical dipole moment	< 2.1×ten−25e⋅cm [six]
Electric polarizability	0.00112(4) fm3
Magnetic moment	i.410606 797 36(sixty)×10−26 J⋅T−1 [7] i.521032 202 30(46)×10−3μ B [5] 2.792847 344 63(82)μ Due north [8]
Magnetic polarizability	1.9(five)×10−four fm3
Spin	ane / 2
Isospin	1 / 2
Parity	+1
Condensed	I(J P ) = 1 / ii ( 1 / 2 +)

A proton is a stable subatomic particle, symbol
p
, H⁺, or ^oneH⁺ with a positive electric accuse of +1e elementary charge. Its mass is slightly less than that of a neutron and 1836 times the mass of an electron (the proton–electron mass ratio). Protons and neutrons, each with masses of approximately one atomic mass unit, are jointly referred to as "nucleons" (particles present in atomic nuclei).

One or more protons are present in the nucleus of every atom. They provide the bonny electrostatic central force which binds the atomic electrons. The number of protons in the nucleus is the defining property of an chemical element, and is referred to every bit the atomic number (represented past the symbol Z). Since each element has a unique number of protons, each element has its ain unique atomic number, which determines the number of atomic electrons and consequently the chemic characteristics of the element.

The discussion proton is Greek for "outset", and this name was given to the hydrogen nucleus by Ernest Rutherford in 1920. In previous years, Rutherford had discovered that the hydrogen nucleus (known to exist the lightest nucleus) could be extracted from the nuclei of nitrogen past atomic collisions.^[9] Protons were therefore a candidate to exist a primal or elementary particle, and hence a building block of nitrogen and all other heavier atomic nuclei.

Although protons were originally considered unproblematic particles, in the modernistic Standard Model of particle physics, protons are now known to be composite particles, containing iii valence quarks, and together with neutrons are now classified as hadrons. Protons are composed of ii upward quarks of accuse + 2 / 3 e and one downwards quark of accuse − one / iii e. The rest masses of quarks contribute only near 1% of a proton's mass.^[ten] The remainder of a proton'southward mass is due to quantum chromodynamics bounden energy, which includes the kinetic energy of the quarks and the energy of the gluon fields that bind the quarks together. Because protons are not primal particles, they possess a measurable size; the root mean square charge radius of a proton is about 0.84–0.87 fm (or 0.84×x⁻¹⁵ to 0.87×x⁻¹⁵ m).^{[eleven] [12]} In 2019, 2 unlike studies, using different techniques, found this radius to exist 0.833 fm, with an uncertainty of ±0.010 fm.^{[xiii] [14]}

Free protons occur occasionally on Earth: thunderstorms can produce protons with energies of up to several tens of MeV.^{[15] [16]} At sufficiently low temperatures and kinetic energies, free protons will bind to electrons. Even so, the character of such bound protons does not change, and they remain protons. A fast proton moving through matter will slow by interactions with electrons and nuclei, until it is captured by the electron cloud of an cantlet. The result is a protonated atom, which is a chemical chemical compound of hydrogen. In a vacuum, when free electrons are nowadays, a sufficiently slow proton may option upwards a single free electron, condign a neutral hydrogen atom, which is chemically a free radical. Such "costless hydrogen atoms" tend to react chemically with many other types of atoms at sufficiently low energies. When free hydrogen atoms react with each other, they grade neutral hydrogen molecules (H₂), which are the most common molecular component of molecular clouds in interstellar infinite.

Gratis protons are routinely used for accelerators for proton therapy or various particle physics experiments, with the most powerful example beingness the Large Hadron Collider.

Clarification [edit]

Unsolved problem in physics:

How do the quarks and gluons carry the spin of protons?

Protons are spin- 1 / 2 fermions and are composed of 3 valence quarks,^[17] making them baryons (a sub-type of hadrons). The two up quarks and one down quark of a proton are held together past the strong forcefulness, mediated past gluons.^{[eighteen] : 21–22} A modern perspective has a proton composed of the valence quarks (upwards, upwards, down), the gluons, and transitory pairs of sea quarks. Protons have a positive accuse distribution which decays approximately exponentially, with a root mean square charge radius of about 0.8 fm.^[nineteen]

Protons and neutrons are both nucleons, which may be jump together by the nuclear force to form atomic nuclei. The nucleus of the most mutual isotope of the hydrogen atom (with the chemical symbol "H") is a lone proton. The nuclei of the heavy hydrogen isotopes deuterium and tritium contain ane proton bound to one and ii neutrons, respectively. All other types of atomic nuclei are composed of two or more protons and various numbers of neutrons.

History [edit]

The concept of a hydrogen-like particle as a elective of other atoms was adult over a long period. Every bit early equally 1815, William Prout proposed that all atoms are composed of hydrogen atoms (which he called "protyles"), based on a simplistic interpretation of early values of atomic weights (see Prout's hypothesis), which was disproved when more authentic values were measured.^{[20] : 39–42}

In 1886, Eugen Goldstein discovered canal rays (too known as anode rays) and showed that they were positively charged particles (ions) produced from gases. However, since particles from different gases had different values of charge-to-mass ratio (e/one thousand), they could not be identified with a single particle, unlike the negative electrons discovered by J. J. Thomson. Wilhelm Wien in 1898 identified the hydrogen ion equally the particle with the highest accuse-to-mass ratio in ionized gases.^[21]

Post-obit the discovery of the atomic nucleus past Ernest Rutherford in 1911, Antonius van den Broek proposed that the place of each element in the periodic table (its atomic number) is equal to its nuclear charge. This was confirmed experimentally by Henry Moseley in 1913 using X-ray spectra.

In 1917 (in experiments reported in 1919 and 1925), Rutherford proved that the hydrogen nucleus is present in other nuclei, a consequence unremarkably described as the discovery of protons.^[22] These experiments began after Rutherford had noticed that, when alpha particles were shot into air (mostly nitrogen), his scintillation detectors showed the signatures of typical hydrogen nuclei as a production. Afterward experimentation Rutherford traced the reaction to the nitrogen in air and found that when alpha particles were introduced into pure nitrogen gas, the event was larger. In 1919 Rutherford assumed that the alpha particle merely knocked a proton out of nitrogen, turning it into carbon. Later on observing Blackett'due south cloud chamber images in 1925, Rutherford realized that the alpha particle was absorbed. Subsequently capture of the alpha particle, a hydrogen nucleus is ejected, so that heavy oxygen, not carbon, is the outcome – i.e., the atomic number Z of the nucleus is increased rather than reduced (see initial proposed reaction below). This was the first reported nuclear reaction, ^xivN + α → ¹⁷O + p. Rutherford at showtime thought of our modern "p" in this equation as a hydrogen ion, H⁺ .

Depending on one's perspective, either 1919 (when it was seen experimentally as derived from some other source than hydrogen) or 1920 (when it was recognized and proposed every bit an elementary particle) may be regarded as the moment when the proton was 'discovered'.

Rutherford knew hydrogen to be the simplest and lightest element and was influenced by Prout's hypothesis that hydrogen was the building block of all elements. Discovery that the hydrogen nucleus is present in other nuclei as an elementary particle led Rutherford to requite the hydrogen nucleus H⁺ a special name as a particle, since he suspected that hydrogen, the lightest element, contained merely one of these particles. He named this new key edifice block of the nucleus the proton, after the neuter singular of the Greek word for "get-go", πρῶτον . However, Rutherford too had in heed the word protyle as used past Prout. Rutherford spoke at the British Association for the Advancement of Science at its Cardiff coming together beginning 24 August 1920.^[23] Rutherford first proposed (wrongly, see above) that this nitrogen reaction was ¹⁴N + α → ^xivC + α + H⁺ . At the meeting, he was asked by Oliver Society for a new name for the positive hydrogen nucleus to avoid confusion with the neutral hydrogen cantlet. He initially suggested both proton and prouton (after Prout).^[24] Rutherford afterward reported that the coming together had accustomed his suggestion that the hydrogen nucleus be named the "proton", following Prout's discussion "protyle".^[25] The first apply of the discussion "proton" in the scientific literature appeared in 1920.^{[26] [27]}

Stability [edit]

Unsolved problem in physics:

Are protons fundamentally stable? Or do they decay with a finite lifetime as predicted past some extensions to the standard model?

The free proton (a proton not bound to nucleons or electrons) is a stable particle that has not been observed to break down spontaneously to other particles. Free protons are constitute naturally in a number of situations in which energies or temperatures are high enough to separate them from electrons, for which they have some affinity. Free protons exist in plasmas in which temperatures are too high to let them to combine with electrons. Free protons of loftier energy and velocity make upward xc% of cosmic rays, which propagate in vacuum for interstellar distances. Gratuitous protons are emitted straight from atomic nuclei in some rare types of radioactive decay. Protons too upshot (along with electrons and antineutrinos) from the radioactive decay of free neutrons, which are unstable.

The spontaneous decay of gratis protons has never been observed, and protons are therefore considered stable particles according to the Standard Model. However, some grand unified theories (GUTs) of particle physics predict that proton disuse should take identify with lifetimes between 10³¹ to 10³⁶ years and experimental searches have established lower bounds on the hateful lifetime of a proton for diverse assumed disuse products.^{[28] [29] [30]}

Experiments at the Super-Kamiokande detector in Japan gave lower limits for proton mean lifetime of six.6×ten³³ years for decay to an antimuon and a neutral pion, and viii.2×10³³ years for disuse to a positron and a neutral pion.^[31] Another experiment at the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory in Canada searched for gamma rays resulting from residue nuclei resulting from the decay of a proton from oxygen-16. This experiment was designed to detect disuse to any product, and established a lower limit to a proton lifetime of 2.1×x²⁹ years.^[32]

However, protons are known to transform into neutrons through the procedure of electron capture (as well called inverse beta disuse). For free protons, this procedure does not occur spontaneously simply only when free energy is supplied. The equation is:

p ⁺
+
due east ⁻
→
n
+
ν
_e

The process is reversible; neutrons can convert back to protons through beta disuse, a common form of radioactive decay. In fact, a gratuitous neutron decays this way, with a mean lifetime of most 15 minutes. A proton tin also transform into neutrons through beta plus disuse (β+ decay).

According to quantum field theory, the mean proper lifetime of protons ${\displaystyle \tau _{\mathrm {p} }}$ becomes finite when they are accelerating with proper acceleration ${\displaystyle a}$ , and ${\displaystyle \tau _{\mathrm {p} }}$ decreases with increasing ${\displaystyle a}$ . Dispatch gives rising to a non-vanishing probability for the transition
p ⁺
→
n
+
e ⁺
+
ν
_east . This was a matter of business organization in the later 1990s because ${\displaystyle \tau _{\mathrm {p} }}$ is a scalar that tin can exist measured by the inertial and coaccelerated observers. In the inertial frame, the accelerating proton should decay according to the formula higher up. Even so, according to the coaccelerated observer the proton is at rest and hence should non decay. This puzzle is solved past realizing that in the coaccelerated frame there is a thermal bath due to Fulling–Davies–Unruh effect, an intrinsic consequence of quantum field theory. In this thermal bath, experienced by the proton, there are electrons and antineutrinos with which the proton may interact co-ordinate to the processes: (i)
p ⁺
+
eastward ⁻
→
due north
+
ν
, (ii)
p ⁺
+
ν
→
n
+
e ⁺
and (iii)
p ⁺
+
east ⁻
+
ν
→
n
. Adding the contributions of each of these processes, one should obtain ${\displaystyle \tau _{\mathrm {p} }}$ .^{[33] [34] [35] [36]}

Quarks and the mass of a proton [edit]

In breakthrough chromodynamics, the modernistic theory of the nuclear force, most of the mass of protons and neutrons is explained past special relativity. The mass of a proton is almost lxxx–100 times greater than the sum of the rest masses of its three valence quarks, while the gluons have zero remainder mass. The extra free energy of the quarks and gluons in a proton, as compared to the rest free energy of the quarks alone in the QCD vacuum, accounts for almost 99% of the proton's mass. The residuum mass of a proton is, thus, the invariant mass of the system of moving quarks and gluons that make up the particle, and, in such systems, even the energy of massless particles is still measured as office of the rest mass of the system.

Ii terms are used in referring to the mass of the quarks that make up protons: current quark mass refers to the mass of a quark by itself, while constituent quark mass refers to the current quark mass plus the mass of the gluon particle field surrounding the quark.^{[37] : 285–286 [38] : 150–151} These masses typically have very unlike values. The kinetic energy of the quarks that is a consequence of confinement is a contribution (see Mass in special relativity). Using lattice QCD calculations, the contributions to the mass of the proton are the quark condensate (~9%, comprising the up and downward quarks and a ocean of virtual strange quarks), the quark kinetic free energy (~32%), the gluon kinetic energy (~37%), and the anomalous gluonic contribution (~23%, comprising contributions from condensates of all quark flavors).^[39]

The constituent quark model wavefunction for the proton is

$${\displaystyle \mathrm {|p_{\uparrow }\rangle ={\tfrac {1}{\sqrt {18}}}\left(two|u_{\uparrow }d_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle +2|u_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }d_{\downarrow }\rangle +2|d_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle -|u_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }d_{\uparrow }\rangle -|u_{\uparrow }d_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }\rangle -|u_{\downarrow }d_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle -|d_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }\rangle -|d_{\uparrow }u_{\uparrow }u_{\downarrow }\rangle -|u_{\downarrow }u_{\uparrow }d_{\uparrow }\rangle \correct)} .}$$

The internal dynamics of protons are complicated, because they are adamant by the quarks' exchanging gluons, and interacting with various vacuum condensates. Lattice QCD provides a mode of computing the mass of a proton directly from the theory to whatever accurateness, in principle. The most recent calculations^{[40] [41]} claim that the mass is adamant to better than 4% accurateness, fifty-fifty to 1% accurateness (see Effigy S5 in Dürr et al. ^[41]). These claims are still controversial, because the calculations cannot yet be done with quarks as calorie-free as they are in the real world. This means that the predictions are constitute by a process of extrapolation, which tin can introduce systematic errors.^[42] It is hard to tell whether these errors are controlled properly, because the quantities that are compared to experiment are the masses of the hadrons, which are known in advance.

These recent calculations are performed past massive supercomputers, and, as noted by Boffi and Pasquini: "a detailed description of the nucleon structure is still missing because ... long-distance behavior requires a nonperturbative and/or numerical treatment ..."^[43] More conceptual approaches to the structure of protons are: the topological soliton approach originally due to Tony Skyrme and the more authentic AdS/QCD approach that extends it to include a cord theory of gluons,^[44] diverse QCD-inspired models like the bag model and the constituent quark model, which were popular in the 1980s, and the SVZ sum rules, which permit for rough approximate mass calculations.^[45] These methods do not accept the aforementioned accurateness as the more brute-force lattice QCD methods, at to the lowest degree not yet.

Accuse radius [edit]

The problem of defining a radius for an atomic nucleus (proton) is similar to the problem of atomic radius, in that neither atoms nor their nuclei have definite boundaries. However, the nucleus can be modeled as a sphere of positive charge for the interpretation of electron scattering experiments: considering there is no definite boundary to the nucleus, the electrons "meet" a range of cross-sections, for which a mean tin exist taken. The qualification of "rms" (for "root mean square") arises because it is the nuclear cross-section, proportional to the square of the radius, which is determining for electron scattering.

The internationally accepted value of a proton'southward charge radius is 0.8768 fm (see orders of magnitude for comparing to other sizes). This value is based on measurements involving a proton and an electron (namely, electron scattering measurements and circuitous calculation involving handful cross section based on Rosenbluth equation for momentum-transfer cross section), and studies of the atomic energy levels of hydrogen and deuterium.

However, in 2010 an international research squad published a proton charge radius measurement via the Lamb shift in muonic hydrogen (an exotic atom fabricated of a proton and a negatively charged muon). Every bit a muon is 200 times heavier than an electron, its de Broglie wavelength is correspondingly shorter. This smaller atomic orbital is much more sensitive to the proton'due south charge radius, so allows more precise measurement. Their measurement of the root-mean-square charge radius of a proton is " 0.84184(67) fm, which differs by 5.0 standard deviations from the CODATA value of 0.8768(69) fm".^[46] In January 2013, an updated value for the charge radius of a proton— 0.84087(39) fm—was published. The precision was improved past one.7 times, increasing the significance of the discrepancy to 7σ.^[12] The 2014 CODATA adjustment slightly reduced the recommended value for the proton radius (computed using electron measurements merely) to 0.8751(61) fm, merely this leaves the discrepancy at 5.6σ.

If no errors were found in the measurements or calculations, it would have been necessary to re-examine the world'southward most precise and all-time-tested fundamental theory: quantum electrodynamics.^[47] The proton radius was a puzzle equally of 2017.^{[48] [49]}

A resolution came in 2019, when two unlike studies, using different techniques involving the Lamb shift of the electron in hydrogen, and electron–proton scattering, plant the radius of the proton to exist 0.833 fm, with an uncertainty of ±0.010 fm, and 0.831 fm.^{[13] [14]}

The radius of the proton is linked to the form factor and momentum-transfer cross department. The diminutive form factor G modifies the cross section corresponding to point-like proton.

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}R_{\text{e}}^{2}&=-6{{\frac {dG_{\text{e}}}{dq^{2}}}\,{\Bigg \vert }\,}_{q^{2}=0}\\{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}\ &={{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}\,{\Bigg \vert }\,}_{\text{bespeak}}G^{two}(q^{2})\end{aligned}}}$

The atomic form factor is related to the wave function density of the target:

${\displaystyle G(q^{ii})=\int due east^{iqr}\psi (r)^{two}\,dr^{3}}$

The class gene can be split in electric and magnetic course factors. These tin exist farther written equally linear combinations of Dirac and Pauli form factors.^[49]

${\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}G_{\text{m}}&=F_{\text{D}}+F_{\text{P}}\\G_{\text{due east}}&=F_{\text{D}}-\tau F_{\text{P}}\\{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}&={{\frac {d\sigma }{d\Omega }}\,{\Bigg \vert }\,}_{NS}{\frac {1}{ane+\tau }}\left(G_{\text{east}}^{ii}\left(q^{2}\right)+{\frac {\tau }{\epsilon }}G_{\text{m}}^{2}\left(q^{2}\correct)\correct)\end{aligned}}}$

Pressure inside the proton [edit]

Since the proton is composed of quarks confined by gluons, an equivalent pressure level which acts on the quarks can be defined. This allows adding of their distribution equally a function of distance from the centre using Compton scattering of loftier-free energy electrons (DVCS, for deeply virtual Compton scattering). The pressure is maximum at the center, almost 10³⁵ Pa, which is greater than the force per unit area within a neutron star.^[50] It is positive (repulsive) to a radial distance of near 0.6 fm, negative (attractive) at greater distances, and very weak beyond virtually 2 fm.

Charge radius in solvated proton, hydronium [edit]

The radius of the hydrated proton appears in the Born equation for calculating the hydration enthalpy of hydronium.

Interaction of costless protons with ordinary matter [edit]

Although protons have analogousness for oppositely charged electrons, this is a relatively low-energy interaction and then costless protons must lose sufficient velocity (and kinetic energy) in society to become closely associated and bound to electrons. High energy protons, in traversing ordinary affair, lose energy by collisions with atomic nuclei, and by ionization of atoms (removing electrons) until they are slowed sufficiently to be captured past the electron deject in a normal cantlet.

However, in such an association with an electron, the character of the bound proton is not changed, and information technology remains a proton. The attraction of low-energy free protons to any electrons present in normal matter (such equally the electrons in normal atoms) causes free protons to stop and to form a new chemical bail with an atom. Such a bond happens at any sufficiently "cold" temperature (that is, comparable to temperatures at the surface of the Dominicus) and with any type of atom. Thus, in interaction with whatsoever type of normal (not-plasma) matter, low-velocity free protons do not remain gratuitous merely are attracted to electrons in whatever atom or molecule with which they come into contact, causing the proton and molecule to combine. Such molecules are and then said to be "protonated", and chemically they are simply compounds of hydrogen, oft positively charged. Ofttimes, as a result, they become and so-chosen Brønsted acids. For example, a proton captured by a water molecule in water becomes hydronium, the aqueous cation H_threeO⁺ .

Proton in chemistry [edit]

Diminutive number [edit]

In chemical science, the number of protons in the nucleus of an cantlet is known as the diminutive number, which determines the chemical chemical element to which the atom belongs. For example, the diminutive number of chlorine is 17; this means that each chlorine atom has 17 protons and that all atoms with 17 protons are chlorine atoms. The chemic backdrop of each atom are determined by the number of (negatively charged) electrons, which for neutral atoms is equal to the number of (positive) protons so that the total accuse is zero. For case, a neutral chlorine atom has 17 protons and 17 electrons, whereas a Cl⁻ anion has 17 protons and 18 electrons for a total charge of −1.

All atoms of a given element are not necessarily identical, however. The number of neutrons may vary to course different isotopes, and free energy levels may differ, resulting in different nuclear isomers. For instance, in that location are two stable isotopes of chlorine: ³⁵
₁₇ Cl
with 35 − 17 = eighteen neutrons and ³⁷
₁₇ Cl
with 37 − 17 = xx neutrons.

Hydrogen ion [edit]

Protium, the most common isotope of hydrogen, consists of i proton and one electron (information technology has no neutrons). The term "hydrogen ion" (H ⁺
) implies that that H-atom has lost its ane electron, causing but a proton to remain. Thus, in chemistry, the terms "proton" and "hydrogen ion" (for the protium isotope) are used synonymously

The proton is a unique chemical species, existence a bare nucleus. As a consequence it has no independent beingness in the condensed state and is invariably found bound past a pair of electrons to some other atom.

Ross Stewart, The Proton: Application to Organic Chemistry (1985, p. 1)

In chemical science, the term proton refers to the hydrogen ion, H ⁺
. Since the atomic number of hydrogen is 1, a hydrogen ion has no electrons and corresponds to a bare nucleus, consisting of a proton (and 0 neutrons for the most arable isotope protium ^one
_ane H
). The proton is a "bare accuse" with simply well-nigh i/64,000 of the radius of a hydrogen atom, and so is extremely reactive chemically. The gratis proton, thus, has an extremely brusk lifetime in chemical systems such every bit liquids and information technology reacts immediately with the electron cloud of whatsoever available molecule. In aqueous solution, information technology forms the hydronium ion, H₃O⁺, which in plough is farther solvated by water molecules in clusters such every bit [H₅O₂]⁺ and [H_nineO₄]⁺.^[51]

The transfer of H ⁺
in an acid–base reaction is usually referred to as "proton transfer". The acid is referred to as a proton donor and the base as a proton acceptor. Likewise, biochemical terms such every bit proton pump and proton aqueduct refer to the movement of hydrated H ⁺
ions.

The ion produced by removing the electron from a deuterium atom is known as a deuteron, non a proton. Likewise, removing an electron from a tritium atom produces a triton.

Proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) [edit]

Also in chemical science, the term "proton NMR" refers to the observation of hydrogen-1 nuclei in (mostly organic) molecules by nuclear magnetic resonance. This method uses the quantized spin magnetic moment of the proton, which is due to its athwart momentum (or spin), which in turn has a magnitude of half the reduced Planck constant. ( ${\displaystyle \hbar /2}$ ). The proper noun refers to examination of protons as they occur in protium (hydrogen-1 atoms) in compounds, and does non imply that gratuitous protons exist in the compound existence studied.

Homo exposure [edit]

The Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Packages (ALSEP) determined that more than than 95% of the particles in the solar wind are electrons and protons, in approximately equal numbers.^{[52] [53]}

Because the Solar Air current Spectrometer made continuous measurements, it was possible to measure how the Earth'due south magnetic field affects arriving solar wind particles. For nearly ii-thirds of each orbit, the Moon is outside of the World's magnetic field. At these times, a typical proton density was x to 20 per cubic centimeter, with almost protons having velocities between 400 and 650 kilometers per 2d. For about five days of each month, the Moon is inside the Earth's geomagnetic tail, and typically no solar wind particles were detectable. For the remainder of each lunar orbit, the Moon is in a transitional region known as the magnetosheath, where the Earth'southward magnetic field affects the solar current of air, but does not completely exclude it. In this region, the particle flux is reduced, with typical proton velocities of 250 to 450 kilometers per second. During the lunar night, the spectrometer was shielded from the solar wind by the Moon and no solar air current particles were measured.^[52]

Protons also take extrasolar origin from galactic cosmic rays, where they make upwardly about xc% of the full particle flux. These protons often take higher energy than solar air current protons, and their intensity is far more uniform and less variable than protons coming from the Dominicus, the product of which is heavily affected by solar proton events such as coronal mass ejections.

Research has been performed on the dose-rate effects of protons, equally typically found in space travel, on human health.^{[53] [54]} To be more specific, there are hopes to identify what specific chromosomes are damaged, and to define the damage, during cancer evolution from proton exposure.^[53] Another report looks into determining "the effects of exposure to proton irradiation on neurochemical and behavioral endpoints, including dopaminergic operation, amphetamine-induced conditioned gustatory modality aversion learning, and spatial learning and memory as measured by the Morris water maze.^[54] Electrical charging of a spacecraft due to interplanetary proton battery has likewise been proposed for study.^[55] There are many more than studies that pertain to space travel, including galactic cosmic rays and their possible health effects, and solar proton consequence exposure.

The American Biostack and Soviet Biorack infinite travel experiments have demonstrated the severity of molecular damage induced past heavy ions on microorganisms including Artemia cysts.^[56]

Antiproton [edit]

CPT-symmetry puts stiff constraints on the relative backdrop of particles and antiparticles and, therefore, is open to stringent tests. For example, the charges of a proton and antiproton must sum to exactly zero. This equality has been tested to one part in 10^eight . The equality of their masses has also been tested to better than 1 role in 10⁸ . By property antiprotons in a Penning trap, the equality of the charge-to-mass ratio of protons and antiprotons has been tested to 1 function in vi×10^ix .^[57] The magnetic moment of antiprotons has been measured with error of 8×ten⁻³ nuclear Bohr magnetons, and is found to be equal and opposite to that of a proton.^[58]

Run across also [edit]

• Fermion field
• Hydrogen
• Hydron (chemistry)
• List of particles
• Proton–proton concatenation
• Quark model
• Proton spin crisis
• Proton therapy

References [edit]

1. ^ "2018 CODATA Value: proton mass". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Dubiousness. NIST. xx May 2019. Retrieved 2019-05-20 .
2. ^ "2018 CODATA Value: proton mass in u". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Dubiousness. NIST. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 2022-09-11 .
3. ^ "2018 CODATA Value: proton mass free energy equivalent in MeV". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Incertitude. NIST. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 2022-09-11 .
4. ^ The SNO+ Collaboration; Anderson, M.; Andringa, Due south.; Arushanova, E.; Asahi, S.; Askins, 1000.; Auty, D. J.; Back, A. R.; Barnard, Z.; Barros, N.; Bartlett, D. (2019-02-20). "Search for invisible modes of nucleon decay in water with the SNO+ detector". Physical Review D. 99 (3): 032008. arXiv:1812.05552. Bibcode:2019PhRvD..99c2008A. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.99.032008. S2CID 96457175.
5. ^ ^{a b c} ""2018 CODATA recommended values"".
6. ^ Sahoo, B. 1000. (2017-01-17). "Improved limits on the hadronic and semihadronic $CP$ violating parameters and part of a dark force carrier in the electric dipole moment of $^{199}\mathrm{Hg}$". Concrete Review D. 95 (one): 013002. arXiv:1612.09371. doi:ten.1103/PhysRevD.95.013002. S2CID 119344894.
7. ^ "2018 CODATA Value: proton magnetic moment". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Incertitude. NIST. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 2022-09-17 .
8. ^ "2018 CODATA Value: proton magnetic moment to nuclear magneton ratio". The NIST Reference on Constants, Units, and Uncertainty. NIST. 20 May 2019. Retrieved 2022-09-17 .
9. ^ "proton | Definition, Mass, Accuse, & Facts". Encyclopedia Britannica . Retrieved 2018-10-20 .
10. ^ Cho, Adrian (2 April 2010). "Mass of the Common Quark Finally Nailed Downwardly". Science Magazine. American Clan for the Advancement of Scientific discipline. Retrieved 27 September 2014.
11. ^ "Proton size puzzle reinforced!". Paul Shearer Institute. 25 January 2013.
12. ^ ^{a b} Antognini, Aldo; et al. (25 January 2013). "Proton Structure from the Measurement of 2S-2P Transition Frequencies of Muonic Hydrogen" (PDF). Science. 339 (6118): 417–420. Bibcode:2013Sci...339..417A. doi:10.1126/science.1230016. hdl:10316/79993. PMID 23349284. S2CID 346658.
13. ^ ^{a b} Bezginov, N.; Valdez, T.; Horbatsch, K.; Marsman, A.; Vutha, A. C.; Hessels, Due east. A. (2019-09-06). "A measurement of the atomic hydrogen Lamb shift and the proton accuse radius". Science. 365 (6457): 1007–1012. Bibcode:2019Sci...365.1007B. doi:ten.1126/science.aau7807. ISSN 0036-8075. PMID 31488684. S2CID 201845158.
14. ^ ^{a b} Xiong, W.; Gasparian, A.; Gao, H.; Dutta, D.; Khandaker, M.; Liyanage, N.; Pasyuk, Due east.; Peng, C.; Bai, X.; Ye, L.; Gnanvo, K. (Nov 2019). "A small proton accuse radius from an electron–proton scattering experiment". Nature. 575 (7781): 147–150. Bibcode:2019Natur.575..147X. doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1721-2. ISSN 1476-4687. OSTI 1575200. PMID 31695211. S2CID 207831686.
15. ^ Köhn, C.; Ebert, U. (2015). "Calculation of beams of positrons, neutrons and protons associated with terrestrial gamma-ray flashes" (PDF). Periodical of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 23 (4): 1620–1635. Bibcode:2015JGRD..120.1620K. doi:10.1002/2014JD022229.
16. ^ Köhn, C.; Diniz, M.; Harakeh, Muhsin (2017). "Product mechanisms of leptons, photons, and hadrons and their possible feedback close to lightning leaders". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 122 (2): 1365–1383. Bibcode:2017JGRD..122.1365K. doi:10.1002/2016JD025445. PMC5349290. PMID 28357174.
17. ^ Adair, R. K. (1989). The Cracking Design: Particles, Fields, and Creation. Oxford University Press. p. 214. Bibcode:1988gdpf.volume.....A.
18. ^ Cottingham, West. N.; Greenwood, D. A. (1986). An Introduction to Nuclear Physics. Cambridge University Printing. ISBN978-0-521-65733-4.
19. ^ Basdevant, J.-L.; Rich, J.; Spiro, M. (2005). Fundamentals in Nuclear Physics. Springer. p. 155. ISBN978-0-387-01672-6.
20. ^ Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry UCLA Eric R. Scerri Lecturer (2006-10-12). The Periodic Table : Its Story and Its Significance: Its Story and Its Significance. Oxford Academy Press. ISBN978-0-19-534567-four.
21. ^ Wien, Wilhelm (1904). "Über positive Elektronen und die Existenz hoher Atomgewichte". Annalen der Physik. 318 (4): 669–677. Bibcode:1904AnP...318..669W. doi:x.1002/andp.18943180404.
22. ^ Petrucci, R. H.; Harwood, W. Due south.; Herring, F. G. (2002). General Chemical science (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall. p. 41. ISBN978-0-13-033445-ix.
23. ^ See meeting report and announcement
24. ^ Romer A (1997). "Proton or prouton? Rutherford and the depths of the atom". American Journal of Physics. 65 (8): 707. Bibcode:1997AmJPh..65..707R. doi:10.1119/1.18640.
25. ^ Rutherford reported acceptance by the British Association in a footnote to Masson, O. (1921). "XXIV. The constitution of atoms". Philosophical Magazine. Series half dozen. 41 (242): 281–285. doi:x.1080/14786442108636219.
26. ^ OED "proton". Oxford English language Dictionary (Online ed.). Oxford Academy Press. Retrieved 24 March 2021. (Subscription or participating institution membership required.)
27. ^ Pais, A. (1986). Inwards Bound . Oxford University Printing. p. 296. ISBN0-19-851997-4. Pais believed the first science literature apply of the word proton occurs in "Physics at the British Association". Nature. 106 (2663): 357–358. 1920. Bibcode:1920Natur.106..357.. doi:10.1038/106357a0.
28. ^ Buccella, F.; Miele, G.; Rosa, L.; Santorelli, P.; Tuzi, T. (1989). "An upper limit for the proton lifetime in And then(10)". Physics Letters B. 233 (i–2): 178–182. Bibcode:1989PhLB..233..178B. doi:10.1016/0370-2693(89)90637-0.
29. ^ Lee, D.1000.; Mohapatra, R.; Parida, Chiliad.; Rani, 1000. (1995). "Predictions for the proton lifetime in minimal nonsupersymmetric SO(10) models: An update". Physical Review D. 51 (1): 229–235. arXiv:hep-ph/9404238. Bibcode:1995PhRvD..51..229L. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.51.229. PMID 10018289. S2CID 119341478.
30. ^ "Proton lifetime is longer than 10³⁴ years". Kamioka Observatory. November 2009.
31. ^ Nishino, H.; et al. (2009). "Search for Proton Decay via p→east⁺π⁰ and p→μ⁺π⁰ in a Large Water Cherenkov Detector". Physical Review Messages. 102 (fourteen): 141801. arXiv:0903.0676. Bibcode:2009PhRvL.102n1801N. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.141801. PMID 19392425. S2CID 32385768.
32. ^ Ahmed, South.; et al. (2004). "Constraints on Nucleon Disuse via Invisible Modes from the Sudbury Neutrino Observatory". Concrete Review Letters. 92 (ten): 102004. arXiv:hep-ex/0310030. Bibcode:2004PhRvL..92j2004A. doi:x.1103/PhysRevLett.92.102004. PMID 15089201. S2CID 119336775.
33. ^ Vanzella, Daniel A. T.; Matsas, George E. A. (2001-09-25). "Decay of Accelerated Protons and the Existence of the Fulling–Davies–Unruh Effect". Physical Review Messages. 87 (15): 151301. doi:x.1103/PhysRevLett.87.151301.
34. ^ Matsas, George Due east. A.; Vanzella, Daniel A. T. (1999-03-16). "Decay of protons and neutrons induced by dispatch". Physical Review D. 59 (nine): 094004. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.094004.
35. ^ Vanzella, Daniel A. T.; Matsas, George Due east. A. (2000-12-06). "Weak decay of uniformly accelerated protons and related processes". Physical Review D. 63 (1): 014010. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.63.014010.
36. ^ Matsas, George E. A.; Vanzella, Daniel a. T. (2002-12-01). "The fulling–davies–unruh effect is mandatory: the proton's testimony". International Journal of Mod Physics D. 11 (ten): 1573–1577. doi:10.1142/S0218271802002918. ISSN 0218-2718.
37. ^ Watson, A. (2004). The Quantum Quark. Cambridge University Printing. pp. 285–286. ISBN978-0-521-82907-6.
38. ^ Smith, Timothy Paul (2003). Subconscious Worlds: Hunting for Quarks in Ordinary Matter. Princeton University Press. Bibcode:2003hwhq.volume.....Southward. ISBN978-0-691-05773-6.
39. ^ André Walker-Loud (xix November 2018). "Dissecting the Mass of the Proton". Physics. Vol. 11. p. 118. Bibcode:2018PhyOJ..eleven..118W. doi:x.1103/Physics.11.118 . Retrieved 2021-06-04 .
40. ^ Run across this news report Archived 2009-04-16 at the Wayback Machine and links
41. ^ ^{a b} Durr, S.; Fodor, Z.; Frison, J.; Hoelbling, C.; Hoffmann, R.; Katz, S.D.; Krieg, South.; Kurth, T.; Lellouch, Fifty.; Lippert, T.; Szabo, 1000.K.; Vulvert, G. (2008). "Ab Initio Conclusion of Light Hadron Masses". Science. 322 (5905): 1224–1227. arXiv:0906.3599. Bibcode:2008Sci...322.1224D. CiteSeerXx.ane.one.249.2858. doi:ten.1126/scientific discipline.1163233. PMID 19023076. S2CID 14225402.
42. ^ Perdrisat, C. F.; Punjabi, V.; Vanderhaeghen, M. (2007). "Nucleon electromagnetic grade factors". Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. 59 (two): 694–764. arXiv:hep-ph/0612014. Bibcode:2007PrPNP..59..694P. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2007.05.001. S2CID 15894572.
43. ^ Boffi, Sigfrido; Pasquini, Barbara (2007). "Generalized parton distributions and the structure of the nucleon". Rivista del Nuovo Cimento. xxx (nine): 387. arXiv:0711.2625. Bibcode:2007NCimR..30..387B. doi:ten.1393/ncr/i2007-10025-7. S2CID 15688157.
44. ^ Joshua, Erlich (December 2008). "Recent Results in AdS/QCD". Proceedings, 8th Conference on Quark Confinement and the Hadron Spectrum, September i–half dozen, 2008, Mainz, Federal republic of germany. arXiv:0812.4976. Bibcode:2008arXiv0812.4976E.
45. ^ Pietro, Colangelo; Alex, Khodjamirian (Oct 2000). "QCD Sum Rules, a Modern Perspective". In M., Shifman (ed.). At the Frontier of Particle Physics: Handbook of QCD. World Scientific Publishing. pp. 1495–1576. arXiv:hep-ph/0010175. Bibcode:2001afpp.book.1495C. CiteSeerX10.1.one.346.9301. doi:10.1142/9789812810458_0033. ISBN978-981-02-4445-3. S2CID 16053543.
46. ^ Pohl, Randolf; et al. (eight July 2010). "The size of the proton". Nature. 466 (7303): 213–216. Bibcode:2010Natur.466..213P. doi:10.1038/nature09250. PMID 20613837. S2CID 4424731.
47. ^ Researchers Observes Unexpectedly Pocket-size Proton Radius in a Precision Experiment. AZo Nano. July 9, 2010
48. ^ Conover, Emily (2017-04-18). "There's still a lot we don't know virtually the proton". Science News . Retrieved 2017-04-29 .
49. ^ ^{a b} Carlson, Carl Eastward. (May 2015). "The proton radius puzzle". Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics. 82: 59–77. arXiv:1502.05314. Bibcode:2015PrPNP..82...59C. doi:10.1016/j.ppnp.2015.01.002. S2CID 54915587.
50. ^ Burkert, V. D.; Elouadrhiri, L.; Girod, F. 10. (16 May 2018). "The pressure distribution inside the proton". Nature. 557 (7705): 396–399. Bibcode:2018Natur.557..396B. doi:x.1038/s41586-018-0060-z. OSTI 1438388. PMID 29769668. S2CID 21724781.
51. ^ Headrick, J. Chiliad.; Diken, E. G.; Walters, R. S.; Hammer, N. I.; Christie, R. A.; Cui, J.; Myshakin, E. M.; Duncan, M. A.; Johnson, 1000. A.; Jordan, K. D. (2005). "Spectral Signatures of Hydrated Proton Vibrations in Water Clusters". Scientific discipline. 308 (5729): 1765–1769. Bibcode:2005Sci...308.1765H. doi:10.1126/science.1113094. PMID 15961665. S2CID 40852810.
52. ^ ^{a b} "Apollo 11 Mission". Lunar and Planetary Constitute. 2009. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
53. ^ ^{a b c} "Space Travel and Cancer Linked? Stony Brook Researcher Secures NASA Grant to Study Effects of Infinite Radiations". Brookhaven National Laboratory. 12 Dec 2007. Archived from the original on 26 Nov 2008. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
54. ^ ^{a b} Shukitt-Hale, B.; Szprengiel, A.; Pluhar, J.; Rabin, B. M.; Joseph, J. A. (2004). "The effects of proton exposure on neurochemistry and behavior". Advances in Space Research. 33 (viii): 1334–ix. Bibcode:2004AdSpR..33.1334S. doi:x.1016/j.asr.2003.10.038. PMID 15803624. Archived from the original on 2011-07-25. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
55. ^ Green, N. W.; Frederickson, A. R. (2006). "A Study of Spacecraft Charging due to Exposure to Interplanetary Protons" (PDF). AIP Briefing Proceedings. 813: 694–700. Bibcode:2006AIPC..813..694G. CiteSeerX10.1.1.541.4495. doi:10.1063/1.2169250. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-05-27. Retrieved 2009-06-12 .
56. ^ Planel, H. (2004). Space and life: an introduction to space biology and medicine. CRC Press. pp. 135–138. ISBN978-0-415-31759-7.
57. ^ Gabrielse, M. (2006). "Antiproton mass measurements". International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 251 (ii–3): 273–280. Bibcode:2006IJMSp.251..273G. doi:x.1016/j.ijms.2006.02.013.
58. ^ "BASE precisely measures antiproton's magnetic moment". CERN . Retrieved 2022-03-04 .

External links [edit]

• Media related to Protons at Wikimedia Commons
• Particle Information Group at LBL
• Large Hadron Collider
• Eaves, Laurence; Copeland, Ed; Padilla, Antonio (Tony) (2010). "The shrinking proton". Sixty Symbols. Brady Haran for the Academy of Nottingham.

Chlorine 37 Protons Neutrons Electrons,

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton

Posted by: bergergaceaddly.blogspot.com

Share this post